Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Tradition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tradition. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

A THOUGHTFUL AND INTELLIGENT ASSESSMENT

One of the most challenging things I read each month is Hillsdale College’s Imprimis. It is intellectually stimulating and culturally relevant.  I don’t pretend to understand everything I read there, but isn’t that the nature of a challenge? 

The edition I just read [July/August 2025/Volume 54, Number 7/8] did not miss the mark. It was an encapsulation of the recent 2025 Commencement Address delivered by Victor Davis Hanson [who many of us see occasionally making contributions on the various conservative news networks].

His introductory remarks were warm, personal and real, as he reflected on his first visit to Hillsdale College in 2004. He reflected on three observations made during that visit:

1.   He left a bicycle unlocked on campus overnight and found it the next morning neither vandalized or stolen.

2.   While visiting the campus bookstore he noticed no therapeutic course titles like peace studies, environmental studies, leisure studies, film studies, gender studies, or sexual studies. Instead, there were courses in all classical aspects of philosophy, literature, languages, history, mathematics, and science.

3.   Upon arriving he observed that students, faculty, and staff at Hillsdale College are happy. “They smile. They say hello to strangers. They shake your hand.”

I will not replicate his remarks – except a few that particularly struck me. He challenged the graduating class with corresponding points about honor, tradition and optimism.

I underlined the following:

“When individual behavior and decorum falter, so does a country, which is, after all, only the common reflection of millions of its individuals.” [p.3]

Immediately thoughts of violence, looting and destroying property leaped to the foreground of my memory. Thoughts about the unsympathetic exchanges between our two political parties and the angry tirades we watch on the floor of our Congress disturbed my mind.

Granted, those who propagate these vehement expressions of anger and discontent are a minority, however, they inevitably taint the bigger picture of our COUNTRY! 

The fact that these exchanges take place as frequently as they do mars the good reflection that we desire!

I also took note of Dr. Hanson’s words regarding tradition:

“So often in the present age, we in our narcissism and arrogance confuse our technical and material successes with automatic moral progress. We seem unaware that thinkers of the past – as early as the Greek poet Hesiod, some 2,700 years ago – worried about just the opposite: they worried that material progress and greater wealth would result in moral regress, given the greater opportunities to gratify the appetites with perceived fewer consequences and to use sophistry to excuse the sin.”

 

[I had to look it up: sophistry means slightly deceptive reasoning.]

Would anyone argue this point? Has moral behavior been improved by our material gain and technological prowess?

I don’t think so.

Cite the diminishing impact and influence of the church in America as a consequence of our wealth and sophistication. It’s a good question for debate: Does the declining influence of the church correspond to the increase of immorality? What do you think?

However, Dr. Hanson deliberately closes his remarks “on a happy note”. He looks to the generation he is addressing in this speech for optimism. He states that “the strength of this country - even in its darkest days like those of April 12, 1861 [the Battle of Fort Sumpter], or December 7, 1941 [the attack on Pearl Harbor] or September 11, 2001 as evidence that even in its darkest days - has always been its singular ability to remain not just unshaken, but confident in its values, its resilience, and its inherent strength to overcome all challenges.” [p.5]

I’m 73½. 🙂  [I’m remembering George Carlin’s bit that states when you reach a certain age, you start counting ‘half-years’ again!]

In short – I’m an old guy. Although I’m still aware of the contributions of Abraham, Moses, Samuel and quite a number of older folks who made major contributions to history [His story]. I’m also aware that our president is 79 years of age – and sets a pace that few can sustain.

However, the future will be more likely impacted by a new and younger generation. Let’s hope and pray that those who cherish values like faith, freedom and respect will lead us into a future that protects those of all ages, finds creative and fair solutions to the complex issues of the global community, and propagates democracy as a preferred system of government. 

Sunday, May 18, 2025

A DEBT OF GRATITUDE

We continue to commemorate the post-resurrection days of our Lord Jesus.  If you count off forty days, you identify Ascension Day [May 29th this year - Thursday].  Traditionally, we count off ten more days to arrive at Pentecost Sunday [June 8th this year]. These ten days approximate the period of time that the [reportedly] 120 followers gathered in an upper room in Jerusalem waiting for the fulfillment of Jesus’ promise.

The Church has traditionally recognized Pentecost as the close of the Easter season and the beginning of the longest liturgical season of the year – ending in November when the Advent Season restarts the church year!  It is frequently referred to as ‘Ordinary Time’ and encourages the Church to focus on the life and teachings of Jesus. 

So, you see, today we continue to celebrate the most holy season of the year as we anticipate the birth of the New Testament Church on Pentecost Sunday!

All of the above is – of course – a pattern given to us by the tradition of the church over many years of observation and practice!  Nowhere are these practices laid out for us in scripture.  Many churches do not give any recognition to these liturgical elements. 

_____________________________________________________

It does, however, merit our attention to reflect on the massive work done by the apostles and church leaders during those first three hundred years. They did not have the benefit of years of reflection and practice to draw upon!  In the earliest years there was surely some floundering for understanding and queries about how to move forward. 

The Christological debates were clearly foremost in their minds.  How did this happen? How did God come down to earth? How could Jesus have been God?  The traditions that we consider as resolute had to be thought through thoroughly with much debate and long-term consideration before they became accepted as authoritative guidance for the Church! 

Things that we consider orthodox had to be distilled.  Things like the virgin birth had to be discerned, debated and declared as official doctrine.  There was a strong counter-belief that Jesus was a man that God ‘adopted’ to be the ‘Son of God’.  They debated among themselves when this ‘adoption’ took place.

o   Was it when Jesus was baptized – clearly a special moment when God spoke from the heavens?

o   Or was it when He took Peter, James and John up the mountain of transfiguration – another special moment graced by Moses and Elijah as well as the spoke words of God?

The Church nearly divided over a debate that argued that Jesus was not eternal as the Father was. Just the observation of a triune God had to be thought through and accepted!  This was one of the primary reasons for the next major conference – the Council of Nicea [in 325 A.D.].

The Council of Nicaea was the first council in the history of the Christian church that was intended to address the entire body of believers. It was convened by the emperor Constantine to resolve the controversy of Arianism, a doctrine that held that Christ was not divine but was a created being. The council deemed Arianism a heresy and enshrined the divinity of Christ by invoking the term homoousios (Greek: “of one substance”) in a statement of faith known as the Creed of Nicaea.

 

The Council of Chalcedon was called by the emperor Marcion and met in modern-day Turkey [451 A.D.].  It was well-attended and exceptionally well documented. It approved the earlier Nicean Creed and created its own creedal statement – known as the Chalcedonian Creed.  It determined that:

“We all teach harmoniously [that he is] the same perfect in godhead, the same perfect in manhood, truly God and truly man, the same of a reasonable soul and body; homoousios with the Father in godhead, and the same homoousios with us in manhood ... acknowledged in two natures without confusion, without change, without division, without separation.” 

 We may scoff at these ideas and wonder about their naiveté in considering such proposals, however, we have the benefit of their deliberations at our disposal. All consequent generations benefit from the painful, deep, theological ruminations that took place in these first three hundred years! 

__________________________________

Gracious God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit,

Some of us have never appropriately thanked You for the spiritual leaders who worked so diligently to understand the deep workings that You initiated with the Incarnation! 

Surely You were vigorously at work to protect the Truth and expose erroneous thinking.

This guiding work persisted through three full centuries before the Church finally discerned the Truth that we now hold as precious and dear! 

However, even today there are attempts to undermine the fundamental truths of our faith!  Continue to raise up apologists to respond to these challenges to our spiritual/biblical foundations!     

Protect Your Church!

Guide Your Church!

Embolden Your Church!

Stir in Your followers a similar desire to expand Your Kingdom to the ends of the earth!

FOR YOUR KINGDOM’S SAKE!

AMEN!