Search This Blog

Thursday, December 5, 2024

ALCOHOL USE IS NO LONGER A MORAL ISSUE

Temperance is not a term that we hear or use much in the 21st century.  But 175 years ago, it was a highly recognized word in American culture.  Around 1850, there was a moral debate going on that ended up focusing on the evils associated with the use of alcohol. 

A poem was published along with a woodcut of a swell-headed, bottle-toting gentleman:

How could I ever think to wed
A man who’s always drunken;
Who really has so large a head,
It looks like a ripe pumpkin.

The woodcut included the words: “Choose for yourselves men: the bottle or a bride.”

Remarkably, in 1851, Maine lawmakers declared the entire state of Maine “dry.”

By 1874, a group of women formed the Women’s Christian Temperance Union [WCTU], advocating total abstinence from alcohol because of its destructive effects on health and family life. 

In the early twentieth century the Prohibition Party had been formed to make an impact on the country’s politics.

SIDEBAR:

My mother was a member of the WCTU and the Prohibition Party.  She would not drink a beverage from a glass that in any way resembled a wine glass. 

I recall an election year when she was denied the privilege of voting because she was not Democrat or Republican, but a member of the Prohibition Party.  She went to the judge on duty at the courthouse in Beaver, PA and he ruled her eligible to vote!  

She had strong convictions opposing the use of alcohol and made no attempt to hide them.  For a humorous story about my mom and dad, see my bog article:  https://hal-lelujah.blogspot.com/2011/12/egg-nog.html

 THE END OF PROHIBITION

 “By the 1930s, it was clear that Prohibition had become a public policy failure. The 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution had done little to curb the sale, production and consumption of intoxicating liquors. And while organized crime flourished, tax revenues withered. With the United States stuck in the throes of the Great Depression, money trumped morals, and the federal government turned to alcohol to quench its thirst for desperately needed tax money and put an estimated half-million Americans back to work.”  [https://www.history.com/news/the-night-prohibition-ended]

In February 1933, Congress easily passed a proposed 21st Amendment that would repeal the 18th Amendment, which legalized national Prohibition.  For the first time in American history, a Constitutional amendment had been repealed!  On December 5, 1933, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Utah were the last three states to meet the necessary ratification process to repeal the amendment. 

“An hour later, with little pomp and circumstance, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a proclamation declaring the end of Prohibition while also admonishing the country to drink responsibly and not abuse ‘this return of individual freedom.’ ‘I trust in the good sense of the American people,’ the president said, ‘that they will not bring upon themselves the curse of excessive use of intoxicating liquors, to the detriment of health, morals and social integrity.’”  [Ibid.] 

A remarkable fact of irony is displayed in the fact that the well-known and highly effective group – Alcoholics Anonymous – was created just a year later in 1934.  By 1939 it published its groundbreaking book, ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS.  In 1940, it opened its first headquarters in Lower Manhattan.  [https://www.columbusrecoverycenter.com/alcohol-addiction/history-of-aa/]

___________________________________

THE COST OF EXCESSIVE ALCOHOL USE

According to a study by Ardu’ Recovery Center Today:
[https://www.ardurecoverycenter.com/economic-costs-of-excessive-alcohol-use/]

Excessive drinking takes a heavy economic toll across the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 2010 economic cost of alcohol abuse was $249 billion. 

Productivity losses and healthcare expenses account for 83% of the annual economic cost. While targeted policies offer the most effective means to alleviate financial stress, cost-benefit analyses consistently reveal that the costs of alcohol consumption outweigh any economic benefits.

2023 report from Harvard Medical School projected that the annual cost of treating alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) alone would more than double over the next two decades, increasing from $31 billion in 2022 to $66 billion in 2040.  

____________________________________

This information is not frequently published although it is obviously readily available.  We continue to live in a country where – within legal age limits – the consumption of alcohol is a free choice.  The morality of this issue is now rarely addressed.

As families and individuals, we must deal with the consequences of our choices. 

4 comments:

  1. Hi Hal, thanks for writing.

    To me it often feels that this conversation (and similar) in the Holiness tradition misses the obvious middle ground.

    Its pretty easy to agree that excessive alcoholism is a bad thing - and likewise easy to get on board with the idea that as Christ followers we ought to strive to be like Christ... holy, set apart.

    But the picture of alcohol presented in this post - which echoes what I have otherwise heard from those in the Holiness movement - is not the experience of alcohol I have in my actual life, nor what I think most people experience.

    The moral correction to "A man who’s always drunken" and "Excessive drinking" is not obviously prohibition but temperance, which your post opens with - "moderation in action, thought, or feeling; restraint. habitual moderation in the indulgence of the appetites or passions" from MW. Moderation is a wide middle ground that you skip over.

    Some of my best conversations about God have been had over mixed drinks. Great relationship building has happened in my life at game nights while enjoying a local craft beer. Are those the uses of alcohol this post is talking about? If so, why do you present only extreme cases of excess alcoholism that do not look like most people's experience of alcohol? Are they not? If so, why completely skip over that middle ground and suggest only extreme contrasts - alcoholism or prohibition, money or morals.

    I really wonder what you think here and hope I don't come across as combative. Having grown up in the Holiness movement and since identifying elsewhere under the protestant umbrella, this conversation and others like it about what Holiness mean have increasingly perplexed me.

    -Matt

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Matt,

      Thanks for your quest to explore my thinking on this blog post. I must admit that I’m not certain who I’m speaking with, but that doesn’t at all hinder me from responding. [I’m not even sure that you’ll be notified of this response?]

      First, let me say that I thoroughly enjoy writing and welcome readers, of course. The blog is open to all but is particularly read by:
      1. My Facebook followers, and
      2. A surprisingly large number of unknown followers from quite a number of nations [mostly Asian]. [For instance, in the last seven days my blog has been read internationally by 783 people, while American readership in the same period was 86. A conundrum for sure; but one that blesses me.]

      I try to mix humor with education, and a place to air my thoughts on a wide array of subjects. I rarely get the opportunity to dialogue with folks about what I have written. I’m honored that you visited my page.

      I believe the main point I was trying to address with this particular blog article is the fact that our American history bears evidence that ‘once-upon-a-time’, the use of (and abuse of) alcohol was clearly considered a moral issue. My purpose was to discern [or at least raise the question]: “Is it still considered a moral issue today?”

      My closing paragraphs state my observation that:” The morality of this issue is now rarely addressed.” That’s my take and may be questioned by others. You justly point out my bias which I hint at in my personal sharing regarding my mother. 😉

      I wish I had been clearer to address the many who find balance and pleasure in their moderate use of alcohol.

      Your appeal for correction is appropriate. Writing [or speaking] for public consumption always involves risk. You have clearly pointed out the value for me to have spoken more of moderation. Thanks for that and for doing so with grace.

      Just for information’s sake, my denomination now includes the following statement:
      “Though alcohol and marijuana are legal drugs in some jurisdictions, both have a history of damaging individuals, families and Society. Both are unpredictably addictive and their destructive effects cannot be fully measured. Their misuse leaves a trail of broken marriages, family violence, crime, industrial loss, ill health, injury, and death. Christ admonishes us to love God with all our being and our neighbor as ourselves (Mark 12:30-31). Therefore we advocate abstinence for the sake of health, family and neighbors.”

      Although no longer a leader in my church, I see here an attempt to address a vital issue with grace and clarity. That is certainly how I would want to express myself in my own personal stance.

      Blessings, Hal

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the reply. I did get an email! Sorry for the anonymity, thought using my google account would show it... Matt Giesmann... you might remember me running around Tri State Family Camp grounds, but more likely that you would know my parents :).

      Coming from fb... I've been following more closely since you filled the pulpit in my old home of Brooke Hills and I've appreciated how you explore your ideas, mostly there on fb. Its one of the few places now that I read good Christain thoughts from the specific tradition I grew up in and strongly identified with at one time. (I had assumed the FMC is your denomination, is that true?) .

      Holiness is a big deal I think for any Christ follower, but certainly an emphasis in the so-named Holiness movement (I remember the painted banner in the camp sanctuary). What that actually means is something I continue to work out and often find myself bumping against the ideas I grew up with... so that's how I'm coming to this blog post!

      Understand on the difficulties of putting something out there on the internet :D. Glad you do!

      -Matt

      Delete
    3. Thank you, Matt. I wondered if it was you. :-) Yes, a FM'er by birth and by choice. It was a joy to help out at The Foundery for a season. Good people and I believe they will have a fruitful future! Thanks for the affirmation. My investment now is largely through writing and I enjoy doing so. I try to stay true to my blog banner: "Inspirational thoughts. Casual reflections. Interesting information. Mind food."

      Please engage me anytime. I appreciate hearing others thoughts and perspectives. It enthralls me to hear of your commitment to living a holy life. That will certainly carry with it the blessings of God!

      Hal

      PS - I'll respond more to folks who make comments now that I know they'll get an email indicating my response! Thanks!

      Delete